Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 2:24:11 GMT -8
Antonello Soro, " social networks are not free, our data is the price we pay ". And it is precisely in this regard that the " Data Protection Package " recently adopted by the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union is relevant, including the Regulation on the protection of personal data and the Directive which regulates the processing of personal data in the sectors of prevention, fight and repression of crimes. In particular, European Regulation 2016/679 provides important innovations in terms of tools aimed at making companies responsible in the processing of personal data.
Well as dealing with the " right to be forgotten ", "data portability" from one data Greece Telegram Number Data controller to another another and to guarantee strengthened protection for minors. In your work as a lawyer, have you ever faced cases related to online privacy? What are the most common problems you find yourself dealing with? The increasingly penetrating influence of the internet in our daily lives has inevitably led to a transformation and adaptation of law and jurisprudence to the new problems raised by the advent of social networks and in general by the diffusion of personal data online.One of the most insidious cases related to online privacy concerns the so-called "right to be forgotten", i.e. the right to be forgotten by those who have been at the center of news indexed in search engines.
The Court of Cassation has defined it as the right "not to further disclose information which, due to the passage of time, is now forgotten or unknown to the generality of members". The right to freedom of the press, which finds its foundation in art. 21 of our Constitution, was certainly not born with the internet and it is right that it should be protected together with the public's interest in knowing facts regarding judicial matters. However, the exercise of the right to freedom of the press requires an adequate balance to be struck with the rights of the people involved to respect for private life.Protection of personal data, guaranteed respectively by articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union. European. Furthermore, what has changed in the exercise of the right to report online compared to the "printed paper" and which is relevant in the affirmation of the right to be forgotten is the permanence, in search engines, of links to news relating to judicial events, often resulting from the simple typing of the name of the person involved, perhaps even many years after the dismissal or acquittal .
Well as dealing with the " right to be forgotten ", "data portability" from one data Greece Telegram Number Data controller to another another and to guarantee strengthened protection for minors. In your work as a lawyer, have you ever faced cases related to online privacy? What are the most common problems you find yourself dealing with? The increasingly penetrating influence of the internet in our daily lives has inevitably led to a transformation and adaptation of law and jurisprudence to the new problems raised by the advent of social networks and in general by the diffusion of personal data online.One of the most insidious cases related to online privacy concerns the so-called "right to be forgotten", i.e. the right to be forgotten by those who have been at the center of news indexed in search engines.
The Court of Cassation has defined it as the right "not to further disclose information which, due to the passage of time, is now forgotten or unknown to the generality of members". The right to freedom of the press, which finds its foundation in art. 21 of our Constitution, was certainly not born with the internet and it is right that it should be protected together with the public's interest in knowing facts regarding judicial matters. However, the exercise of the right to freedom of the press requires an adequate balance to be struck with the rights of the people involved to respect for private life.Protection of personal data, guaranteed respectively by articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union. European. Furthermore, what has changed in the exercise of the right to report online compared to the "printed paper" and which is relevant in the affirmation of the right to be forgotten is the permanence, in search engines, of links to news relating to judicial events, often resulting from the simple typing of the name of the person involved, perhaps even many years after the dismissal or acquittal .